The courts like to see cases handled with some reasonable dispatch. Compared to most states, Oregon has a fast scheduling system. Most of the time, the goal is to get civil cases to trial in a year. Because of this, if you neglect your case, you may be out of luck if something happens when you aren’t paying attention. A recent case, Union Lumber Co. v. Miller, 360 Or 767 (2017), <www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S062459.pdf>, illustrates what can happen. Read the rest of this entry »
In both Oregon and Washington, as in many states, auto insurance policies include a provision for personal injury protection (PIP), which covers medical expenses resulting from an accident regardless of fault, up to a moderate limit. In most cases, PIP claims are not controversial. A recent case from Oregon, McBride v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 282 Or App 675 (2016), <http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A159232.pdf>, however, illustrates the importance of cooperation by the insured in resolving disputes. Read the rest of this entry »
Most driving under the influence laws include bicycles and a broad range of motorized wheeled vehicles in their scope. Oregon is no exception to this. But what’s the rule for motorized wheelchairs? A recent case, State v. Greene, 282 Or App 120 (2016), <http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A154816.pdf>, rules that in most cases, they are not subject to driving under the influence law. Read the rest of this entry »
In 1986, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled that a person could not recover for emotional damages unless he or she suffered some physical contact from a negligent action. Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed, 302 Or 155 (1986), <http://law.justia.com/cases/oregon/court-of-appeals/1986/717-p-2d-165.html>. That was the law in Oregon for 30 years. In a recent case, however, the Oregon Supreme Court disagreed, expanding the right to recover emotional damages. Philibert v. Kluser, 360 Or 698 (2016), <http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S063738.pdf>.
To qualify for Medicaid, an applicant must have limited income and limited assets. Once a person receives benefits, the State of Oregon may, after the person and any surviving spouse dies, recover benefits paid by claiming against property the person held at the time of death. As a result, some people try transferring their property to trusts or their spouses. A recent case, Nay v. Dept. of Human Services, 360 Or 668 (2016), <http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S062978.pdf>, confirms that the state does not have the power to reach back to recover property given to a spouse before applying for Medicaid. Read the rest of this entry »
Liability insurance policies usually include two main agreements by the insurer. First, the insurer agrees to defend the insured against claims that may come within the policy. Second, if the insured is liable for a claim, the insurer agrees to pay up to the policy limit. Read the rest of this entry »
In 2000, the Supreme Court ruled that nonparents could only be awarded custody and visitation rights to children if the parents were not acting in the best interests of the children. Troxel v. Granville, 530 US 57, 120 S Ct 2054, 147 L Ed 2d 49 (2000), <http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/530/57.html>. As a result, Oregon, Washington, and most other states amended their third-party parenting rights laws to conform to the Supreme Court’s mandate. A recent case from Oregon, Husk v. Adelman, 281 Or App 378 (2016), <www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A158504.pdf>, illustrates how these laws are applied in practice.